We've been trying to keep you updated on much-blogged-about Hart County Kentucky school superintendent Ricky Line vs. the KY State Education Commissioner Terry Holliday throwdown. A while ago, I showed you some letters to the editor of the Lexington Herald-Leader in support of evolution and Holliday. On Christmas, the Herald-Leader published a more stereotypical Kentucky response to the whole ordeal:
Academic bullying
In his letter Sunday, the chair of the University of Kentucky biology department lacked the grace to acknowledge that those who believe in intelligent design or creationism use facts to support their beliefs.This guy is awesome. What nuanced arguments!
Evolution is still a theory and not a proven law of science. Also, this is the only theory allowed to be taught in public schools, despite its lacking evidence.
There is an embarrassing lack of transitional fossils to document in stone the many transitions of life if evolution happened, evidence that Charles Darwin himself said would be required to prove his theory of natural selection.
In agreement with Hart County Superintendent Ricky Line's concern, I have reviewed biology texts used in public schools and found drawings of creatures that never existed to teach how one animal changed into another. If myth must be used to prove evolution, why not allow intelligent design to present its case?
Should children be taught what to think as indoctrinated robots or how to think enabling them to wisely evaluate facts? A belief in God or intelligent design is not a handicap to understanding the laws of physics and chemistry or applying them in any scientific discipline. It never hurt scientists Michael Faraday, Gregor Mendel, Isaac Newton or James Clerk Maxwell.
Many educated, scientifically trained men are not convinced there is evidence in nature that one kind of animal changed into another.
The letters against Line are academic bullying, preaching and supporting the enforcement of one paradigm over another by law.
James Ashcraft
Richmond









